Refutation

. What is my thesis?
Cause football can give positive impacts to the society, we should encourage football.

 
2. What is the opposite position?
Football is just one of sports and it's not effect to change society.

3. What arguments can I anticipate?
a) There are more effective factors that can change society.
b) It is not sure that football can give positive impacts.
4. How will I counter these arguments?
a) I don't mention about footbal is the best way to change society positively. However, if it has benefit, it is undoubtedly sure to do that.
b) When you see examples of many football players and campaign related to them, you can notice that their power is not that small. They have enough power to change society positively.

Refutation.


  I think football can give positive impacts and make bette society. However, some people said that there are more effective factors that can change society, not football. But  I don't mention about footbal is the best way to change society positively. However, if it has benefit, it is undoubtedly sure to do that.I think when these benefits become together, that's the proper period that society could be changed positively.

Also, some people said that it is not sure that football can give positive impacts. However, When you see examples of many football players and campaign related to them, you can notice that their power is not that small. They have enough power to change society positively. In fact, entertainers and football players are not that different if we see them as an acpects of influening to people in the world. If we see famous entertainers, they change world with their beautiful voice or acting ability. So, it is sure that they will improve our society with football.